| Message |
Details |
Its all about context, was it contiguous or was it clearly separate from the title.
It reminds me of the discussion on "3D" on the front cover, when Ken Cole confirmed its correct usage in the cover title. For me, the edition needs to be clearly segregated from the title.
That's why I voted YES to title. | Posted: Topic Replies: 19, Topic Views: 5136 |
 |
Both volumes (191329-204207 and 191329-231616) were digibook (with slip cover) box sets with the same cover title.
The cover title entered in both box parent profiles was "Universal Classic Monsters: Icons of Horror Collection", there was no edition name.
Since the parent and child discs use the same slip covers, how can the child disc have an edition name when the parent doesn't have an edition name? The assumption the second volume disc profiles were correctly configured is questionable. | Posted: Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 2002 |
|
| I just hope the screener is not confusing media types to include bonus material disc media. We shall see. | Posted: Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 1629 |
|
Whilst you are correct, you need to change the existing profile from a 4K/Blu-ray combo set configuration to a 4K only configuration.
I would suggest writing your amendment as follows:
Current profile was incorrectly configured as a 4K/Blu-ray combo set, the back cover clearly specified a single 4K feature disc with a Blu-ray bonus material disc .
• disabled Blu-ray media check box
• removed Blu-ray (Main Feature) disc info
• features as found on 4K disc and Blu-ray bonus material disc, as per normal 2-disc profile configuration.
Hope that helps. | Posted: Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 1629 |
|
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
I believe "Loew's Incorporated" was the correct name. It was formed by Marcus Loew in 1924. Incorporated was not a suffix here, it was part of the name as denoted by the possessive apostrophe.
Correction: "Loew's Incorporated" was formed by Marcus Loew in 1919. | Posted: Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 3627 |
|
| I believe "Loew's Incorporated" was the correct name. It was formed by Marcus Loew in 1924. Incorporated was not a suffix here, it was part of the name as denoted by the possessive apostrophe. | Posted: Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 3627 |
|
The copyright registration for the film's screenplay (dated 24-Jun-2015) used the title Boyka: Undisputed IV:
https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_28434635
However, the copyright registration for the motion picture (dated 29-Mar-2017) used the title Boyka Undisputed 4:
https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_28992956
The film's supplemental copyright registration (dated 22-Aug-2023) used the same title, Boyka Undisputed 4:
https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/voyager_35957388 | Posted: Topic Replies: 4, Topic Views: 2664 |
|
All in a Night's Work (1961) ==> Howard Smith
The Matchmaker (1958) ==> Howard Smith
Who's Got the Action? (1962) ==> Howard Smith | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 10543 |
|
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Have you compared the results to see which function that seems best in finding blurry scans? Even though the results are different, I find it hard to say that one is more efficient than the other. How about you?
There was a reasonable correlation between the two methods. Those with poor contrast and /or fewer colours were typically rated with lower variance. Back covers tended to have higher variance values than their corresponding front cover, as they had, in the main, more information (text, colours, images, contrast).
Either method is fine. The output result can be sorted from lowest to highest variance (that is, worst to best), so allows for quick identification and confirmation that the image in question is in need of fixing.
In some cases, a low variance image cannot be improved because it is mainly a dark image (or solid colour) with small variations in pixel intensities. | Posted: Topic Replies: 20, Topic Views: 9049 |
|
SharpnessCheck ver. 1.1.0 (64-bit)
Scan 3920 profiles on Intel (Coffee Lake) i5-8600K CPU @ 3.60GHz (6 cores, no hyperthreading):
Laplacian:
(Front)
parallel tasks
6 ==> 21.86 secs
3 ==> 30.89 secs
2 ==> 43.94 secs
1 ==> 84.25 secs
(Back)
6 ==> 22.23 secs
3 ==> 30.97 secs
2 ==> 44.28 secs
1 ==> 84.46 secs
Wavelet:
(Front)
parallel tasks
6 ==> 13.18 secs
3 ==> 14.78 secs
2 ==> 17.58 secs
1 ==> 29.13 secs
(Back)
6 ==> 13.31 secs
3 ==> 14.93 secs
2 ==> 18.01 secs
1 ==> 30.09 secs
Windows resource monitor shows all processors are active, no matter how many parallel tasks are configured.
All cores at 100% when parallel tasks at 6 or more, and all cores at a lower % of activity depending on the reduced number of parallel tasks configured.
Hope that helps. | Posted: Topic Replies: 20, Topic Views: 9049 |
|
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Has the problem with adding new birth years also been fixed? I haven't been able to check. Perhaps someone that's more into birthyears can check that?
I'm not sure if this is the same problem you were describing, but I remember trying to add a new profile in June this year and the web site came back with an error message about a birth year not being allowed.
I just created an update to this profile and added the birth year and surprisingly, the web site now asks me to click a check box with this new entry and to provide additional notes verifying this change.
Is this the scenario you describe? | Posted: Topic Replies: 12, Topic Views: 8411 |
|
| This tool (v2.0) is a Hollywood production, it works like a dream! | Posted: Topic Replies: 32, Topic Views: 14662 |
|
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
wow... thanks Tim... I honestly don't know how I want to vote on this one. I been going back and forth on this in my head since you posted it! 
There is already a precedent in the online database for a comic book artist being credited for OMB and OCB, and that is Jack Kirby (CAPTAIN AMERICA, ANT-MAN, AVENGERS, BLACK PANTHER, FANTASTIC FOUR, HULK, IRON MAN, THOR, X-MEN, ...).
Jack Kirby was an American comic book artist, he was not a writer. He combined with writers Stan Lee and Joe Simon to create many of the super heroes. | Posted: Topic Replies: 4, Topic Views: 4347 |
|
Interesting credit. When it comes to screenplay adaptations, a graphic novel is no different to a comic book, the screenwriter may use the text and/or drawings to better understand/develop the story and its characters.
As such, I consider the above screen credit as a source material credit (OMB). | Posted: Topic Replies: 4, Topic Views: 4347 |
|